Brian A. Rothbart, D.P.M.,Ph.D. [Primary Author] 012059 Sugarland Valley Drive Herndon, Virginia USA 22070
(703) 834.0089 FAX (703) 834.0511
EMail: Internet"Rothbart@Delphi.com"

Revised 4/08/95

RESOLVING LOW BACK PAIN: Treat the Foot

.

Copyright, All Rights Reserved 199
by
Brian A. Rothbart, D.P.M.,Ph.D.
Kevin Hansen, P.T.
Paul Liley, D.D.S.
M. Kathleen Yerratt, R.N.

This manuscript may not be used in part/whole for any other reason without the primary author written authorization.

INTRODUCTION:

Low back pain is one of the most common complaints seen by health care providers. the patient's complaints are most often vague and unrelated to any specific cause or injury. These people have often been to any number of physicians for symptomatic relief, only to find that the pain returns when therapy is terminated. Is there a way to better help these people?

PREMISE:
One of the leading causes of low back pain, unrelated to disease or trauma, is poor posture alignment associated with gait abnormalities. The specific gait problem is hyperpronation [inward collapse of the foot] often associated with forefoot varum deformity. Clinically, the patient is assessed 'biomechanically' rather than 'medically' from head to toe.

GOOD ALIGNMENT:
The biomechanical approach focuses on the patient's posture and walking pattern. The manner in which the patient stands and walks [postural mechanics] is compared to the anatomical neutral model. This neutral model is the classic concept of "perfect posture". A straight line can be drawn from the head through the torso down through the ankle ending at the ground [see figure 2]. The shoulders, pelvis, and ankle joints are 'level', side to side. The student of kinetics would describe the body's center of gravity as being in the anatomically correct position or, more eloquently, as being at equilibrium. Visually, the patient stands perfectly straight. As this patient walks, the same straight lines are maintained. Dynamically, the 'perfect' anatomical model has a smooth, quiet, walking pattern. There is no excessive motion, e.g., no ungainly, asymmetrical lurges.
HYPERPRONATOR:
In contrast to good postural mechanics, poor postural mechanics is ungainly, uneven, asymmetrical. Visually, there is some degree of inward rotation of both feet. This inward collapse of the feet affect all the weight bearing joints above, e.g., the superstructure [See Figure 2]. The knees may come closer together, the low back may appeared 'swayed' [rotated forward], and the head and shoulders may shift forward ['chicken neck' with hunched shoulders]. In addition, it is common to hear that the patient has been diagnosed with a leg length difference or muscular tightness. As these patients walk, they appear to limp. They walk heavy footed. The shoulders and arms have a more limited motion and appear 'tight' With each step, this patient is putting stress through the entire musculoskeletal structure.

LOW BACK PAIN STUDY:

Treating with Orthoses. In varying degrees, removing the stress from the skeleton and muscles, is the most effective treatment. That is, the foot is supported to maintain a correct posture without muscular exertion [an engineer would describe this as fortifying the foundation of a building to stabilize the roof]. When symmetry is reintroduced , the stress on the musculoskeletal structure is reduced and significant healing occurs.

A four year study of 208 patients with back pain was conducted at the Bellevue Foot and Ankle Center. All 208 patients were hyperpronators. Prior to this study, all of these patients had been treated with various modalities including anti inflammatory medication, physical therapy, injections, and in some cases surgery. All these patients were, to some degree, disappointed with their outcomes. They were committed to permanent relief and an improved quality of life.

In this study these patients were treated with orthoses ranging from arch support devices to sophisticated Postural Control Orthotics [PCO Trademark by PCO, Inc.]. Orthoses treatment is dependent upon the pattern of hyperpronation [heel contact vs. midstance], the severity of the low back pain, and the patient's objective goals in therapy. Mild, early stance phase hyperpronation patterns associated with relatively mild low back pain were treated with traditional arch support orthoses. More severe midstance hyperpronation patterns associated with moderate to severe low back pain were treated with precise Postural Control Orthoses. One year after therapy was completed, the following subjective outcomes were reported: [1] 139 reported improvement of 70% or greater, [2] 31 reported improvement of 50 to 60 percent, [3] 24 reported improvement of 10 to 40 percent, [4] 6 reported no improvement, and [5] 3 reported that their low back symptoms increased.

CONCLUSION:
Although patient stated outcomes are not based on pure scientific protocol, if the patient does not feel better after treatment is concluded, the effectiveness of that treatment must be questioned. Over 90% of the patients participating in the above Low Back Study, improved in a conservative orthoses treatment plan.
Biomechanics from the ground up is a concept that is easily understand, i.e., a weak foundation affects the entire structure. The above study strongly suggests that orthoses therapy in the presence of hyperpronation is effective in reducing low back pain. The authors encourage comment on this preliminary position paper.

The End.